Rama and Ben Blushi a coffee to confirm cooperation (UPDATE) | Gazette Theme
Ben Blushi seems to have decided to say privately thoughts or criticisms that could have the party leader Edi Rama. For some time he has not appeared in the media to criticize the conduct of the party or oppose political decision of the caucus. Last time I spoke publicly Blushi made among the opposition to the government than among the opposition within the opposition. Ben Blushi has long chosen to be part of the party, to engage in election commissions of the charter party, in Parliament and little or no media has provided material to keep your eyes open for any signs of conflict and controversy within the largest party the opposition. Blushi months has decided to remain silent, forgotten Unlike Thought Movement, created immediately after the defeat in the elections of June 2009, when he asked Rama to resign and accept responsibility as the underdog and when he kristalizonte figure as a potential leader of this party. Rama-Blushi duel never ended, and the battle started quietly rested, unlike ç'kish launched. And yet again a conversation between these two socialists seem a curiosity, leaving room for conjecture for deals, pacts, etc. etc. On a Saturday pathmark apolitical pathmark media have paid little attention to a coffee not between Rama and good arguments in the bar next to pink seat, where they both spent almost all morning. pathmark A coffee that if they wanted the protagonists could be consumed and in the office without giving the public dimension and food media to guess the possible agreement on the eve of the congress. The two protagonists refused to give any details about what they talked, when possible topics of discussion were numerous, since Congress party expected, new elections in management structures, which probably Blushi any concrete goal, and up to their creative work as writers. At the same time displaying the books, literature Blushi "Albania", and while Rama political confession "Sacrifice". Regarding the possibility of re-election as a member pathmark to the board good arguments, taking an office secretary or any other task in the direction of the Parliamentary Group remains to wait for the conclusion of the elections that will make new assembly of the party. Words about taking a significant position in the party by good arguments have become increasingly stronger. Even words within the SP go on as the lead in the top Blushi Parliamentary Socialist Group in place of Gramos Ruchi, post Blushi it had before 2009. What seems clear and has no need for hamendime is that Blushi Rama have solved the main problem is communication between them, while at the background appear Kastriot Islami, Malaj of Andis Harasani MPs are threatening to leave the party and creating a new party. Their meetings with members of the base on the eve of the new Congress and the charges against Rama and the current head of manipulation in the selection of delegates appears to be localized to the grievances of these three deputies.
Blushi-Rama conflict started after the elections of 2009 went as principled, statutory and understood as the tourney for the chair to attract good arguments. Further became a constant criticism on the issue of boycott, hunger strike, worth dispense worth. But Blushi renounced the possible splitting of the party when he realized how he stood and grouping thought to follow him in relation to Rama and when he realized that within the LMN-in there was unity movement pathmark leader and objectives. Malaj appeared as the "messenger" of Nano and took the reins of Rama's rival in the party. Blushi thought he would open his ambition path to power in SP seeking gentlemen pathmark rotation when Rama said shortly after June 2009 at a meeting of chairmanship "now opens the way for us to others", but in fact did not happen just because Rama not felt losers did not give up leadership of the party just because it's like Blushi. pathmark But despite the controversy seems to Rama knew also choose between "enemies" of its domestic featuring Blushi evaluate the while neglecting the other hand Malaj or Islam, to which was left to the Twitter status which meant they s' know what to do with freedom within the party. But Ben Blushi appears to be an "enemy" necessary it can also be a valuable collaborator for. Bring good arguments against Rama is always different because it brought pathmark against "enemies" other, not as the fear that is taking pathmark the party than it looks from the assessment that has to be and accounts that made seeing more valuable pathmark as a collaborator than as the opponent. A strong reason pathmark to "swallow" and the work that might have spoiled his image in the international community, as was highlighted recently by the US embassy cables where Blushi was an "employee" of
Ben Blushi seems to have decided to say privately thoughts or criticisms that could have the party leader Edi Rama. For some time he has not appeared in the media to criticize the conduct of the party or oppose political decision of the caucus. Last time I spoke publicly Blushi made among the opposition to the government than among the opposition within the opposition. Ben Blushi has long chosen to be part of the party, to engage in election commissions of the charter party, in Parliament and little or no media has provided material to keep your eyes open for any signs of conflict and controversy within the largest party the opposition. Blushi months has decided to remain silent, forgotten Unlike Thought Movement, created immediately after the defeat in the elections of June 2009, when he asked Rama to resign and accept responsibility as the underdog and when he kristalizonte figure as a potential leader of this party. Rama-Blushi duel never ended, and the battle started quietly rested, unlike ç'kish launched. And yet again a conversation between these two socialists seem a curiosity, leaving room for conjecture for deals, pacts, etc. etc. On a Saturday pathmark apolitical pathmark media have paid little attention to a coffee not between Rama and good arguments in the bar next to pink seat, where they both spent almost all morning. pathmark A coffee that if they wanted the protagonists could be consumed and in the office without giving the public dimension and food media to guess the possible agreement on the eve of the congress. The two protagonists refused to give any details about what they talked, when possible topics of discussion were numerous, since Congress party expected, new elections in management structures, which probably Blushi any concrete goal, and up to their creative work as writers. At the same time displaying the books, literature Blushi "Albania", and while Rama political confession "Sacrifice". Regarding the possibility of re-election as a member pathmark to the board good arguments, taking an office secretary or any other task in the direction of the Parliamentary Group remains to wait for the conclusion of the elections that will make new assembly of the party. Words about taking a significant position in the party by good arguments have become increasingly stronger. Even words within the SP go on as the lead in the top Blushi Parliamentary Socialist Group in place of Gramos Ruchi, post Blushi it had before 2009. What seems clear and has no need for hamendime is that Blushi Rama have solved the main problem is communication between them, while at the background appear Kastriot Islami, Malaj of Andis Harasani MPs are threatening to leave the party and creating a new party. Their meetings with members of the base on the eve of the new Congress and the charges against Rama and the current head of manipulation in the selection of delegates appears to be localized to the grievances of these three deputies.
Blushi-Rama conflict started after the elections of 2009 went as principled, statutory and understood as the tourney for the chair to attract good arguments. Further became a constant criticism on the issue of boycott, hunger strike, worth dispense worth. But Blushi renounced the possible splitting of the party when he realized how he stood and grouping thought to follow him in relation to Rama and when he realized that within the LMN-in there was unity movement pathmark leader and objectives. Malaj appeared as the "messenger" of Nano and took the reins of Rama's rival in the party. Blushi thought he would open his ambition path to power in SP seeking gentlemen pathmark rotation when Rama said shortly after June 2009 at a meeting of chairmanship "now opens the way for us to others", but in fact did not happen just because Rama not felt losers did not give up leadership of the party just because it's like Blushi. pathmark But despite the controversy seems to Rama knew also choose between "enemies" of its domestic featuring Blushi evaluate the while neglecting the other hand Malaj or Islam, to which was left to the Twitter status which meant they s' know what to do with freedom within the party. But Ben Blushi appears to be an "enemy" necessary it can also be a valuable collaborator for. Bring good arguments against Rama is always different because it brought pathmark against "enemies" other, not as the fear that is taking pathmark the party than it looks from the assessment that has to be and accounts that made seeing more valuable pathmark as a collaborator than as the opponent. A strong reason pathmark to "swallow" and the work that might have spoiled his image in the international community, as was highlighted recently by the US embassy cables where Blushi was an "employee" of
No comments:
Post a Comment