Monday, October 20, 2014

What we really should want is to increase consumption while lowering environmental impact. My advic

Consumerism Blessed be He @ BIZWIZ
October is here and it is the period in which they usually start to appear in greater Christmas ads and decorations supermarkets. Each year finds several personalities (celebrities) that on the radio or on television, rails against consumerism. We hear opinions that people should take advantage of Christmas to meet with the family and not the crazy rush for gifts. Myopia these views is quite clear.
Probably not for the last month we sense a bit more how it looks when people stop buying and not being so much consumerist. They start to fall weaker companies will be more unemployed in pracáku, the state is not the construction of new roads and pay rises for nurses.
I dare say that anyone who promotes the idea that we as a society should behave less consumerist and reduce their consumption simultaneously zara france promotes low standard of living, layoffs, less poverty and progress. Let's be glad that we have a high consumption and that we treat consumerist. Because this is a sign that we as a society richer. That we are doing better than in the Middle Ages.
Try to imagine what would happen if a really important part of the company listened to the promptings of celebrities and spiritual guru to lower consumption. The real effect would be that we in the first quarter of the following year to hear more bad economic news. Simply put, if you do Franta Christmas without gifts and consumerism, its neighbor Pepa after Christmas can blow off work. It will be a wonderful gift for him.
I think that a lot of people rail against consumerism for environmental reasons. I guess all we suspect that a lot of factories burdens surrounding environment. We have therefore difficult problem. When you buy a new Christmas mobila, will support the work of Mr. Wang Lee Hanga from China (who made it) and Pepy, who sells cell phones on Wenceslas Square. On the other hand, maybe a little more zasmradíme our planet and gets on one Chinese river near the factory. Would you rather dirty and the river, or rather throw Pepa from work? What do you think?
Restrict consumption to have a greener planet (now I do not know why, remembered President Klaus) zara france is not the right way. Remove the one problem and create another. Let's be glad that we have consumerism. This means that we can live our lives better level. Otherwise we stuck in some pastoušce zara france at vyhasínajícího fire, which is baked wheat pancake.
What we really should want is to increase consumption while lowering environmental impact. My advice before Christmas is: treat yourself All you want. Where you have a choice, opt for "environmentally sensitive" product. If you buy someone MPtrojku, buy the one that has a less toxic substances and travels from China in a smaller package. Do Christmas potato salad, put the bio-carrots and let their children fully recyclable Barbie (if any).
it will not take long and soon we'll be back "stuck in some pastoušce at vyhasínajícího zara france fire, which is baked wheat pancake". And it is because of your glorified konzumu.Problém is that it lends itself to we will have devastated the planet zara france unlike our ancestors.
I think that is produced sparingly. There has rightly directed effort and not to the absurd damping needs. Demand for goods creates entrepreneurs and those jobs again. Without demand will not work. Period. Exclamation mark. Let me put it another way. For example. when we find that we are growing consumption of electricity, so we should look for ways to produce as efficiently as inventing a better light bulb. Confused ecologist would instead do a campaign that so many people do not shine.
Thomas,'s nice that you think that it is produced with care, however, is not made sparingly and probably in a large gently never produce nebude.Vyrábět sparingly because today is dráž.A to produce an especially during times of crisis (which will last for god knows how long ) because nobody nechce.A me (and you think "insane" ecologists) comes better not to produce mainly futility that person actually nepotřebuje.Zamyslel you ever wondered how utterly useless things today produces and consumes? How many natural resources are wasted on things that are thrown in a few years? These resources will be missing in the next ten / hundred-letích the more necessary věci.Všechno will be so expensive that the things that we take for unseen will be able to afford only a few at the top. And I suggest to look at these two movies:
If I can get movies and look. Thank you. The argument about buying a useless, I've heard so many times that I can not even count. And always is that one major problem "group of people or person A has a feeling that the other group or person B buys futility." Honestly, who has the right to go and someone else pointing at things and claim: zara france that you bought too! I'm sure you have things at home that I accrue unnecessary zara france and I have things at home, which in turn will accrue useless to you.
XHTML: You can use the following tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr t

No comments:

Post a Comment