FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Audio Interfaces and standalone recorders Both audio and MIDI interfaces (sound bluewater cards) as a stand-alone recording systems are discussed in this zone.
Hello everyone, I will try my desire to put down as clearly as possible, and hopefully some people provide me with advice I'm a demanding amateur and get yourself one track in the bunch. It is important that I vocals, guitar and (possibly?) Midi can respond via my interface bluewater (MIDI possibly because I've also been a cable above). I have a pretty fast laptop with Windows bluewater 7-32 bit. I see now I'm going to use my TonePort to me not up to the task is. "Increasingly larger plugins Anyhow, the TonePort UX2 always had a lot of trouble with Windows 7 and the latency can I still quite large. I think this is for it so most of my sound card TonePort because my laptop should bluewater be able to handle this, I think anyway ... Requirements bluewater of the interface: - At least one input for a microphone (preferably 2) - At least one input for recording guitar bluewater - Powerful sound that the latency can be lowered - so there is not need or something to sit on, I'll take all 16 tracks in one particular, one track on. I also have a Midi1x1 Emu cable, MIDI I take this and this is Showy fine ... Now I do not know whether it is useful bluewater to also have ... on your midi interface or that has benefits? ... So if This question can be answered ... still totally fine! I look forward to suggestions! Suppose I greatly appreciate Thank thank you!
There are just different interfaces, from good to very good and cheap to very expensive. Anyone can go straight or recommend something here, but you still keep in my best moment consider the following factors. What is your budget? How do you want to go to connect (USB / Firewire) him? See you in the future expansion of your setup? What are your requirements for quality to? If you come with us to share these factors may be some focused replied. bluewater __________________ bluewater Intel Core2Duo / Cubase 5.5 / SSL Duende / UA Twin Finity 710 / Tannoy Reveal / sE Z5600a / ADK S7 / Mackie Big Knob
Thanks for the quick response, and the demand to fill. Demands my list Budget: Around 300 Interface: USB Expansion: Not likely, you have a small room where I scratch bluewater track by track recording everything here. No wish very much in / to have quality outputs: As high as possible for my budget ... I notice that my tone port it is nice, but the latency is still quite a lot. Moreover, it does not work smoothly with Windows bluewater 7 (often problems
Quote: Originally Posted by josske
m-audio fast track ultra. USB Did I just purchased. Good material. greetz idd, very nice and good interface. M-Audio has excellent drivers, and relatively low latency. __________________ Intel Core2Duo / Cubase 5.5 / SSL Duende / UA Twin Finity 710 / Tannoy bluewater Reveal / sE Z5600a / ADK S7 / Mackie Big Knob
Thanks for the comments! Just purely looking at the specs, this was destijd said about the TonePort UX2 TonePort UX2 delivers 24-bit recording, 96kHz sample rate support and over 100dB signal-to-noise bluewater ratio for truly album quality results. bluewater The single 1/4-inch input accommodates guitar, bass or microphone (XLR inputs require an adapter), and its USB connection combines superb 24-bit audio quality with low latency Tone Direct monitoring. I'm going with the M-Audio interface, bluewater or so much ahead? For example, since they have also 24bit/96 Khz: The Fast Track Ultra 8 x 8 audio / MIDI interface takes M-Audio's acclaimed mobile recording line to the next level with high-speed USB 2.0 connectivity, MX Core DSP mixer and four preamps with award-winning Octane technology. bluewater Featuring both analog and digital I / O, It allows recording on all eight channels simultaneously with pristine 24-bit/96kHz fidelity-while M-Audio's mature low-latency drivers ensurement rock-solid stability and performance. The on-board MX Core DSP mixer processes eight hardware inputs and eight software returns to the eight hardware outputs, delivering flexible routing and monitoring with delay and reverb. Compatible with most major audio software *, Fast Track Ultra lets you record the way you want-in the studio or on the go. * Compatible with all ASIO and Core Audio-based applications. So, here are fluently questions: - Is the M Audio Fast Track Ulta clearly better than the TonePort UX2? - If not, maybe it is dam to Windows 7 in combination with my TonePort that it does not really running smoothly, I am willing to invest in a better interface, but I need to be sure that I have in terms of equipment than actually for expenditure
I do not know personally both options. The Fast Track I have read a lot about this forum and m
No comments:
Post a Comment